In re Naveah W.
Annotate this CasePetitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families, filed termination petitions with respect to Mother’s two children, alleging that Mother’s parental rights should be terminated. The trial court granted both petitions. The Appellate Court reversed the judgments of the trial court for failure to make written findings required under Conn. Gen. Stat. 17a-112(k)(4). Specifically, the Appellate Court concluded that the trial court failed to comply with the statute because it failed to set forth express written findings as to the children’s emotional ties with Mother. The Supreme Court reversed, holding (1) the Appellate Court improperly determined that the trial court failed to make the appropriate findings under section 17a-112(k)(4); (2) as set forth in In re Eden F.; (2) although a trial court shall consider and make written findings regarding the factors enumerated in section 17a-112(k), a trial court’s determination of the best interests of a child will not be overturned on the basis of one factor if the court’s determination is otherwise factually supported and legally sound; and (3) the trial court’s finding as to the children’s best interest in this case was factually supported and legally sound.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.