State v. Nash
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of, among other crimes, intentional assault in the first degree and reckless assault in the first degree. The intentional and reckless assault in the first degree convictions were based on the same conduct. the Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) Defendant’s convictions for intentional and reckless assault in the first degree were not legally inconsistent because the two mental states required to commit the offenses related to different results; and (2) the evidence was sufficient to support Defendant’s conviction of intentional assault in the first degree.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.