State v. Williams
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of two counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of unlawful restraint in the first degree, and being a persistent dangerous felony offender. Defendant appealed, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in precluding testimony from Defendant’s expert witness on the fallibility of eyewitness identifications. The Appellate Court affirmed, holding that the eyewitness in question had sufficient prior familiarity and contact with Defendant such as to make her identification of him reliable, and therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding Defendant’s expert from testifying. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the eyewitness’s previous contact with Defendant made the trial court’s decision to exclude the expert testimony on the fallibility of eyewitness identification an appropriate exercise of its discretion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.