State v. Jordan
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of possession of an amphetamine-type substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent and possession of an amphetamine-type substance with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school. The Supreme court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding (1) assuming, without deciding, that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion to suppress drugs seized from a closet, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) the evidence was sufficient to sustain Defendant’s conviction for possession with intent to sell but insufficient to demonstrate Defendant’s intent to sell within a school zone; and (3) Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial due to prosecutorial impropriety. Remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.