State v. Eleck
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree by means of a dangerous weapon. On appeal, Defendant argued that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to admit evidence of an online conversation proffered by Defendant to impeach one of the state’s witnesses on the grounds that the document was inadmissible because it was improperly authenticated. The Appellate Court affirmed. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that assuming, without deciding, that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to exclude the proffered evidence, the ruling was harmless.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.