O'Connor v. Larocque
Annotate this CasePlaintiff and Defendant were two sisters who held interests in a vacant lot as tenants in common. Plaintiff brought a quiet title action, claiming full ownership of the lot through adverse possession. The trial court quieted title to the real property in favor of Plaintiff, holding that Plaintiff had disseized Defendant of her interest in the property. Defendant appealed, contending that the trial court improperly determined that Plaintiff had (1) overcome the presumption that possession by a tenant in common is not adverse to another cotenant, and (2) proven by clear and convincing evidence the elements of an adverse possession. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the trial court improperly rendered judgment for Plaintiff on her adverse possession claim because there was not unequivocal evidence that Plaintiff expressly notified or conveyed a clear and unmistakable intent to disseize Defendant of her interest in the lot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.