People v. Nguyen (2001)

Annotate this Case
[No. S075300. Jan. 17, 2001.]

[Modification of Opinion (24 Cal.4th 756) with no change in judgment.]

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THUAN VAN NGUYEN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT.-

The opinion herein, appearing at 24 Cal. 4th 756, is modified as follows:

The final sentence of the last full paragraph on page 4 of the slip opinion in this case [24 Cal. 4th 760, advance report, 2d par., lines 8-9] is modified to replace the phrase "reversed the resulting conviction of robbery, holding that" with the phrase "held that the defendant could not be prosecuted for robbery, because" so that the sentence will read as follows: "The Court of Appeal held that the defendant could not be prosecuted for robbery, because the saxophone had not been taken from the possession of the security guard."

This modification does not affect the judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.