In re McCracken
Annotate this CaseIn re HENRY FORD McCRACKEN, on Habeas Corpus.
COUNSEL
Monroe, Chula & Lines for Petitioner.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
OPINION
THE COURT.
[1] The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued on the application of Henry Ford McCracken, having completely fulfilled the function for which it issued, is now therefore discharged. The petitioner is continued in the custody of the warden to await the further order of this court in the appeal proceedings in McCracken v. Teets, S. F. No. 18788.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
