Gordon v. Rombotis

Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 21703. In Bank. Dec. 11, 1951.]

SAMUEL J. GORDON, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. ROMBOTIS et al., Defendants; ELBERT, LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant.

COUNSEL

John F. Bender and Gizella M. Allen for Appellant.

Charles I. Rosin for Respondent.

O'Melveny & Myers, Louis W. Myers, Sidney H. Wall and Ernest M. Clark, Jr., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

SPENCE, J.

This is a quiet title action presenting questions similar to certain questions determined in two cases this day filed, Scheas v. Robertson, L. A. No. 21357, ante, p. 119 [238 P.2d 982] and Sipe v. Correa, L. A. No. 21421, ante, p. 131 [238 P.2d 989]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff was correctly adjudicated a "bona fide purchaser for value" and entitled to rely on the conclusive presumption found in the 1945 amendment of section 2911 of the Civil Code.

The judgment is affirmed.

Gibson, C.J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.