Butte v. Distillery, Rectifying and Wine Workers

Annotate this Case
[S. F. No. 17355. In Bank. Feb. 5, 1948.]

FELIX BUTTE, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. DISTILLERY, RECTIFYING AND WINE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 45, etc., et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Dearing, Jertberg & Avery and Kenneth C. Avery for Appellants.

Robert M. Barnard and Clarence E. Todd for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

CARTER, J.

In this action plaintiffs' prayer for injunctive relief is based upon the Hot Cargo Act (Lab. Code, ยงยง 1131-1136), and hence is controlled by the decision in In re Blaney, 30 Cal. 2d 643 [184 P.2d 892]. Here a judgment of dismissal was entered after a demurrer was sustained. On the authority of the Blaney case, the judgment is affirmed.

Gibson, C.J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

SHENK, J.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in In re Blaney, 30 Cal. 2d 643, at page 661 [184 P.2d 892].

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.