Caminetti v. Superior Court of Orange County

Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 17727. In Bank. January 6, 1941.]

A. CAMINETTI, Jr., as Insurance Commissioner, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent.

COUNSEL

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, William T. Sweigert, Assistant Attorney- General, and Walter L. Bowers, John L. Nourse and Neil Cunningham, Deputies Attorney-General, for Petitioner.

Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy, Sherman & Sherman, Robert W. Kenny and Morris E. Cohn for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

The facts and issues presented in this proceeding together with such additional observations as appear in Caminetti v. Superior Court, S. F. 16476 (ante, p. 850 [108 PaCal.2d 918]), this day filed, are substantially similar to those presented in Caminetti v. Superior Court, S. F. 16479 (ante, p. 838 [108 PaCal.2d 911]), this day decided. For the reasons advanced in and upon the authority of the last cited case, let peremptory writs of prohibition and mandate issue respectively restraining the respondent Superior Court from taking any further steps or proceedings in the conservatorship proceeding pending therein, and directing it to transfer the same to the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles.

Gibson, C.J., did not participate in the decision.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.