Sachse v. Craemer

Annotate this Case
[L. A. No. 16582. In Bank. June 10, 1938.]

RICHARD SACHSE, Petitioner, v. JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc., Respondent.

COUNSEL

John C. Campbell and Franz R. Sachse for Petitioner.

Clock, McWhinney & Clock and James C. Ingebretsen for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

This is a companion case to the case of The Ventura Co., Inc., v. Craemer, this day decided (ante, p. 407 [80 PaCal.2d 720]). [1] On the authority of that decision and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed therein the petitioner herein is entitled to the writ of mandamus.

Let the peremptory writ issue.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.