P. v. Patterson

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 5/24/17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) RON DOUGLAS PATTERSON, ) ) Defendant and Appellant. ) ____________________________________) S225193 Ct. App. 4/2 E060758 Riverside County Super. Ct. No. EE220540 ORDER MODIFYING OPINION THE COURT: The opinion filed herein on March 27, 2017, appearing at 2 Cal.5th 885, is modified as follows: The first sentence of the second paragraph on page 901 is revised to read: “To establish that he was prejudiced by counsel s alleged errors, Patterson must show „that a reasonable probability exists that, but for counsel s incompetence, he would not have pled guilty (Resendiz, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 253) to the charge of possession of MDMA, which subjected him to mandatory deportation.” This modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.