P. v. Mar
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 9/11/02 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES ALLEN MAR, Defendant and Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) S086611 Ct.App. 5 F028945 Kern County Super. Ct. No. 68695 ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] BY THE COURT: The majority opinion herein, filed August 22, 2002, is modified as follows: Add as a last sentence to footnote 1, page 16, the following sentence: Of course, it is customary for the opinions of appellate courts to include citations to the published work of student authors. (See, e.g., Cal. Style Manual (4th ed. 2000) § 3.8, pp. 100-101; ABA, Judicial Opinion Writing Manual  A Product of the Appellate Judges Conference (1991) rule 5.4, p. 71; Golden Gateway Center v. Golden Gateway Tenants Assn. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1013, 1020-1021, fn. 4 & accompanying text (plur. opn. by Brown, J.) [stating that numerous legal commentators have . . . questioned . . . curious omissions [in this court s decision] in Robins [v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899], and citing, among other authorities, a student Comment in Gonzaga Law Review, a student Comment in the University of Richmond Law Review, and a student Note in the California Law Review].) The dissenting opinion of Brown, J., is modified as follows: Delete footnote 1 and italicize the phrase student comment in the last sentence on page 3. This modification does not affect the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
