[REVIEW GRANTED] Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California v. Superior Court (Cargill) (2001)

Annotate this Case
[Nos. B148446; B148451.

Second Dist., Div. One.

Nov. 15, 2001.]

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; DEWAYNE CARGILL et al., Real Parties in Interest.

[Modification of opinion (92 Cal.App.4th 1112) on denial of petition for rehearing with no change in judgment.]

THE COURT. fn. *-

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on October 16, 2001, be modified in the following particulars:

1. In the first full paragraph on page 30 [92 Cal. App. 4th 1139, 3d par.], delete the entire first sentence before footnote 2, beginning with "Thus, we agree" and ending with "enrollment." and replace it with the following:

Thus, we agree with the trial court that MWD is required to enroll all its common law employees in CALPERS.

This modification does not have an effect on the result.

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

FN *. Before Spencer, P.J., Ortega, J., Mallano, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.