State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Superior Court (People) (2001)

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND on denial of petition for rehearing with no change in judgment, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

[Modification of opinion (91 Cal.App.4th 1080) on denial of petition for rehearing with no change in judgment.]

THE COURT. fn. * -

The September 6, 2001 letter filed by petitioner requesting modification of the opinion has been considered and is hereby granted. The opinion is modified as follows. The phrase "who is not counsel of record for State Fund in this writ proceeding" is added after the word "lawyer" in the third line of the second paragraph on page 8 [Page 91 Cal. App. 4th 1088, advance report, 2d par., line 3]so that the sentence commencing on the second line of that paragraph will now read: "Although inartfully drafted, the motion by State Fund's lawyer, who is not counsel of record for State Fund in this writ proceeding, requested an opportunity to first review the sealed documents to specifically identify the documents subject to the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine."

This modification does not constitute a change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed on September 10, 2001, by real party in interest and the opposition thereto filed on September 17, 2001, have been read and considered and the petition is hereby denied.

FN *. Before Vogel (C.S.), P.J., Hastings, J., and Curry, J.