[REVIEW GRANTED] Valdez v. Clayton Industries, Inc. (2001)

Annotate this Case
[No. B139582. Second Dist., Div. Four. June 4, 2001.]

ALEX VALDEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CLAYTON INDUSTRIES,INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

[Modification of Opinion (88 Cal. App. 4th 1162; __ Cal.Rptr.2d __) on denial of petition for rehearing.]

THE COURT. fn. * -

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 8, 2001, be modified as follows:

1. On page 7, line 4 of the third full paragraph [88 Cal. App. 4th 1171, advance report, 4th par., line 4], delete the numeral "27" and replace it with the numeral "25."

2. On page 15, line 6 of the first full paragraph [88 Cal. App. 4th 1177, advance report, 3d par., line 6], delete the numeral "27" and replace it with the numeral "25."

[There is no change in the judgment.]

Respondents' petition for rehearing is denied.

FN *. Before Epstein, Acting P.J., Hastings, J., and Curry, J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.