Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Courtfn. 1

Annotate this Case
Opinions (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Courtfn. 1 );

People v. Superior Court (Marks)fn. 2 ; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.fn. 3 ;

Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Courtfn. 4 ; Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v.

Superior Courtfn. 5 ; People v. Stellingfn. 6 ; People v. Hanselfn. 7 ; Krol v. Sampsonfn. 8 ;

Demonet Industries v. Transameria Ins. Co.fn. 9 ; Gantt v. Sentry Insurancefn. 10 ;

Woosley v. State of Californiafn. 11 ; Ford v. Gouinfn. 12 ;

Van Meter v. American Motor Sports Assn.fn. 13 ;

and Mirkin v. Wassermanfn. 14 )

on pages 428-748 omitted.

REVIEWS GRANTED

FN 1. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 207, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 2. See 1 Cal. 4th 56 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 3. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 260, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 4. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 295, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 5. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 299, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 6. On February 13, 1992, review dismissed and cause remanded to Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five.

FN 7. See 1 Cal. 4th 1211 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 8. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 330, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 9. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 331, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 10. See 1 Cal. 4th 1083 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 11. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 343, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 12. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 379, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 13. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 402, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 14. Reprinted without change in 6 Cal. App. 4th 414, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.