In re Vallindras

Annotate this Case

[Crim. No. 2675. First Dist., Div. Two. Apr. 20, 1950.]

In re JOHN A. VALLINDRAS, on Habeas Corpus. [97 Cal. App. 2d 74]

COUNSEL

Gus C. Ringole for Petitioner.

OPINION

THE COURT.

[1] The petition for a writ of habeas corpus does not allege that there was no conflict in the evidence of petitioner's ability to pay under the order nor that there was no evidence supporting the finding. Such was the case found in In re Johnson, 92 Cal. App. 2d 467 [207 P.2d 123].

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.