Roche v. McColgan

Annotate this Case

[Civ. No. 7342. Third Dist. July 25, 1947.]

THEO. J. ROCHE, Appellant, v. CHARLES J. McCOLGAN, as State Franchise Tax Commissioner, Respondent.

COUNSEL

Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Farraher and Eustace Cullinan for Appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

It appears from the stipulation of the parties that the same legal questions are presented in this proceeding as those in Cullinan v. McColgan, 3 Civ. No. 7341, ante, page 976 [183 P.2d 115], this day filed.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.