People v. Watson

Annotate this Case
[Crim. No. 309. Fourth Appellate District. April 10, 1935.]

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. EUGENE WATSON, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Olin N. MacKay for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Bayard Rhone, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

OPINION

Barnard, P. J.

[1] The defendant appealed from a judgment following his conviction on a charge of assault by means and force likely to do great bodily harm. The clerk's transcript and the reporter's transcript were filed in this court on February 28, 1935, and the cause was regularly placed on the calendar for April 9, 1935. No appearance has been made on behalf of the appellant either at the time set for oral argument or by brief. The attorney-general has moved to affirm the judgment under section 1253 of the Penal Code.

The motion is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.