Vallera v. Vallera

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 13586. Second Dist., Div. Two. Apr. 24, 1942.]

MARIAN VALLERA, Appellant, v. CONCEZIO VALLERA et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

William Ellis Lady for Appellant.

Zagon & Aaron for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

It appearing from the certificate of the clerk of the superior court that on February 5, 1942, an order was made by the superior court terminating proceedings on the appeal of the plaintiff, and

It further appearing that plaintiff has not furnished this court with a sufficient record on appeal,

It is ordered that the motion of defendant to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff be, and it is hereby granted.

It follows as a matter of course that the motion of plaintiff to be allowed to use portions of the record filed by defendant on his appeal must be, and it is, hereby denied.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 22, 1942.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.