People v. Hogue
Annotate this CaseTHE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RUTH HOGUE, Appellant.
COUNSEL
No appearance for Appellant.
Earl Warren, Attorney General, for Respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum
THE COURT.
May 22, 1941, the transcripts on appeal were filed in this court. Thereafter, the time for filing briefs having elapsed, an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed was issued, returnable September 24, 1941. On the latter date there was no appearance on behalf of appellant, either by brief or otherwise. [46 Cal. App. 2d 875]
Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment of the trial court hereby is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
