MacCloskey v. Krueger
Annotate this CaseJOHN A. MacCLOSKEY, Appellant, v. RAY KRUEGER et al., Respondents.
COUNSEL
Lawrence Hall and Havelock Fraser for Appellant.
Joseph A. Ball and Robert E. Krause for Respondents.
OPINION
The Court.
[1] The respondents having filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by said certificate and by the authorities cited,
It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. [40 Cal. App. 2d 811]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
