State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 10031. Second Appellate District, Division Two. January 17, 1935.]

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Petitioners, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, DARRAHL FRANKLIN STOCK, a Minor, et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

F. Britton McConnell for Petitioners.

Everett A. Corten and Emmet J. Seawell for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Scott, J., pro tem.

[1] Respondent Stock was given a relief work order by respondent county and while working thereunder was injured. The essential facts are the same as in the case of State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. et al., Civil No. 10030 (ante, p. 665 [40 PaCal.2d 277]), this day decided, and the same rule should apply as to the award.

Award annulled.

Stephens, P. J., and Crail, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.