Ford v. Carkeek

Annotate this Case

[Civ. No. 12045. Second Appellate District, Division Two. November 9, 1938.]

MARY FORD, Appellant, v. STANLEY CARKEEK et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

No appearance for Appellant.

Syril S. Tipton for Respondents.

OPINION

The Court.

[1] This case comes before us on motion to dismiss for failure of the appellant to file a transcript of the record within the time allowed by law and for failure to file a brief. The motion is accompanied by a clerk's certificate.

The motion is good; appeal dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.