Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 5926. Third Appellate District. January 27, 1938.]

ALPHONZO E. BELL CORPORATION (a Corporation), Appellant, v. BELL VIEW OIL SYNDICATE et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Overton, Lyman & Plumb, Eugene Overton, Chalmers L. McGaughey and Donald H. Ford for Appellant.

Neil S. McCarthy, Earl L. Banta, Haight, Trippett & Syvertson for Respondents.

Sherman & Sherman, Austin C. Sherman, Thomas Reynolds, Willard W. Wallace and Sidney Cherniss, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

The Court.

[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed in Civil No. 5927 (ante, p. 587 [76 PaCal.2d 167]), the orders of the trial court sustaining demurrers to the plaintiff's amended complaint must be held erroneous, the judgment of dismissal therein reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to overrule the demurrers, granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint, if so desired, and likewise, granting privilege to the defendants to file answers within such reasonable time as may be deemed just.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.