Culver v. Barrett
Annotate this CaseKATHRYN CULVER, etc., Appellant, v. ENID P. RIGGS BARRETT, Respondent.
COUNSEL
W. I. Gilbert and David L. Sefman for Respondent.
OPINION
The Court.
This is an appeal from the superior court. The clerk's transcript and reporter's transcript were filed August 16, 1937. [1] No appearance has been made by the appellant, either by brief or orally. The case comes before us on the court's own order to the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Due service of the order having been made, the order is granted.
Appeal dismissed. [23 Cal. App. 2d 739]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
