Couch v. McGregor

HENRY JAMES COUCH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. N.E. McGREGOR et al., Respondents; M. W. BEALE et al., as Trustees, etc., Cross-Defendants and Appellants.

COUNSEL

Walter Gould Lincoln for Appellants.

Carlo S. Morbio and Carl A. Onkka for Respondents.

OPINION

The Court.

This cause is before us upon a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the plaintiffs from an order of [23 Cal. App. 2d 16] the trial court denying the motion of plaintiffs to strike out the appearance and answer of cross-defendant, Nevada Monarch Gold Mining Company, a corporation, to the cross-complaint filed in said action.

A reference to section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure shows that no appeal lies from the order referred to. (See, also, the case of Couch et al., Plaintiffs v. McGregor et al., Defendants, 19 Cal. App. 2d 633 [66 PaCal.2d 159], and the cases there cited.)