Wadsworth v. Gonzales

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 1555. Fourth Appellate District. December 6, 1934.]

WINIFRED WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. JUAN GONZALES et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Charles E. Hobart and J. K. Lilly for Appellant.

Borton & Petrini, Osborn & Burum and Harry M. Conron for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Marks, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for new trial. The facts are identical with those in the case of Ida F. Wadsworth v. Juan Gonzales, bearing our civil number 1554 (ante, p. 651 [38 PaCal.2d 860], the opinion in which case is this day filed.

[1] Upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons there given, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied without prejudice to the making of another such motion at a future time and the right of the court to dismiss on its own motion or otherwise the attempted appeal from an unappealable order.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.