Wiley v. Industrial Accident Commission

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 10982. Second Appellate District, Division Two. September 5, 1936.]

THELMA RUTH WILEY, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

F. Britton McConnell and Conant Wait for Petitioner.

Everett A. Corten, Emmet J. Seawell and Willis I. Morrison for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Wood, J.

Petitioner seeks to review a decision of the Industrial Accident Commission by which she was denied compensation for the death of her husband, George H. Wiley, who was killed while landing in an airplane at a location of his employer, Universal Pictures Corporation.

Mr. Wiley was employed as art director and had designed a set for the photographing of a picture to be known as "Storm Over The Andes". He went to inspect the set in an airplane driven by Charles Stumar, chief camera man for the production. In attempting to make a landing at the location both men were killed. The facts surrounding [16 Cal. App. 2d 757] the accident are set forth in the opinion in the case of Stumar v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 429 [60 PaCal.2d 557]), this day filed. The essential facts of the two cases are similar and the same principles of law are applicable to both cases.

[1] For the reasons stated in the opinion in Stumar v. Industrial Acc. Com., the order of the commission denying compensation herein is annulled and the matter remanded to the commission for further proceedings.

Crail, P. J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.