Estate of Dow

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 17057. First Dist., Div. One. Apr. 2, 1956.]

Estate of EDGAR LAURENCE DOW, Deceased. MAXINE PATRICIA HUTCHINSON, Respondent, v. MAXINE B. DOW, Individually and as Administratrix With the Will Annexed, etc., Appellants.

COUNSEL

J. Oscar Goldstein, P. M. Barceloux, J. Burton Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, Erskine, Erskine & Tulley and Morris Erskine II, for Appellants.

William A. White and Hutchinson & Quattrin for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The appeal herein is from an order of September 7, 1955, which is described in our opinion this day filed in Dow v. Superior Court, No. 1 Civil 16939, ante, p. 399 [297 P.2d 30].

Respondent herein has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the asserted ground that the order in question is nonappealable. We hold that those provisions of the order which direct the payment of money or the distribution of property are appealable for the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 16939. The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. Peters, P. J., and Bray, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.