Seward v. Wilkerson

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 21136. Second Dist., Div. One. July 19, 1955.]

THOMAS F. SEWARD, Respondent, v. WILLIAM R. WILKERSON, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Bautzer, Grant & Silbert and Gilbert D. Seton for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

OPINION

DRAPEAU, J.

Motion by defendant to augment the record.

[1] Defendant contends that when plaintiff invoked the remedy of attachment the action was converted from equity to law, and that as a consequence plaintiff elected to proceed in law. Therefore, defendant moves to add to the record the several papers involved in the issuance of the writ of attachment.

Without passing upon the sufficiency of the contention, this court is of the opinion that it will do no harm to have the entire record before it when it considers the merits of the case.

The motion is granted.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.