Baird v. Maguire

Annotate this Case
Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Bernardino

[Civ. A. No. 18. June 3, 1954.]

GENE BAIRD et al., Appellants, v. EVERETT MAGUIRE et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Swing & Gillespie for Appellants.

H. R. Griffin for Respondents. [125 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 908]

OPINION

COUGHLIN, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in a claim and delivery action involving the possession of an automobile.

[1] The appellants contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain this judgment. The record before this court does not include either a settled statement of facts or a reporter's transcript of the oral proceedings before the trial court. Under these circumstances on appeal it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Hilliard, J., and Mitchell, J., concurred.