Security First National Bank v. Denton

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 1767. Fourth Appellate District. February 13, 1936.]

SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Corporation), as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. MILDRED B. DENTON et al., Defendants; MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

COUNSEL

John Ralph Wilson and McKinstry, Haber & Coombes for Appellants.

William C. Crossland for Respondent.

OPINION

The Court.

[1] The respondent herein has confessed error in the record and all parties have stipulated that the judgment may be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and that the remittitur be issued forthwith.

The errors pointed out appear to be material, prejudicial and sufficient to justify a reversal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, the remittitur to issue forthwith. [11 Cal. App. 2d 708]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.