Estate of Clayton

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 18820. Second Dist., Div. One. Jan. 8, 1952.]

Estate of WALTER CLAYTON, Deceased. QUINCY McMILLON et al., Appellants, v. ETHEL ROWE CLAYTON, Respondent.

COUNSEL

Walter L. Gordon, Jr., for Appellants.

Noel Edwards for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

[1] Respondent Ethel Rowe Clayton moves to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants from an order denying a motion made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure which sought to vacate and set aside an order which admitted a will to probate and granted letters of administration with will annexed.

The case is governed by the holding of the Supreme Court in Estate of Estrem, 16 Cal. 2d 563 [107 P.2d 36], and accordingly upon the authority of that decision the appeal lies and the motion to dismiss must be and it is denied. So ordered. [108 Cal. App. 2d 584]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.