Penland v. Golden

ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Major & Tenner and Jack Tenner for Respondents.

OPINION

HANSON, J. pro. tem.

[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.