People v. De La Rosa Burgara
Annotate this Case
In the case before the Court of Appeal of the State of California Sixth Appellate District, the defendant, Mariano Alejandro De La Rosa Burgara (De La Rosa), was initially sentenced to an aggregate stipulated sentence of eight years in prison after pleading no contest to charges of assault with a deadly weapon and hit-and-run driving resulting in permanent, serious injury. On appeal, De La Rosa argued that the postsentencing enactment of Senate Bill 567, which altered the requirements for imposition of an upper term under Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (b), necessitated a remand for resentencing.
The court agreed with De La Rosa, concluding that defendants who received an upper term pursuant to a plea agreement that included a stipulated sentence are entitled to a remand under Senate Bill 567. The court found that the changes brought about by Senate Bill 567, which made the middle term the presumptive sentence for a term of imprisonment unless aggravating circumstances stipulated to by the defendant or proven true beyond a reasonable doubt justified imposition of an upper term, applied retroactively to De La Rosa's nonfinal judgment. The court also noted that the implementation of these new requirements could result in a complex series of decisions by the parties and the trial court on remand.
Thus, the court reversed the judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings under the amended Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (b). However, the court did not decide whether De La Rosa could be sentenced to a prison term greater than the aggregate eight-year term agreed to in the original plea agreement, leaving that issue for the trial court to consider on remand.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.