People v. Pacheco
Annotate this Case
During the fire season, Pacheco set fire to brush in a river bed near a homeless encampment and a ranch. Pacheco told a psychologist that he lit the fire because voices in his head told him to do so, but told a probation officer he lit the fire “so he could smoke methamphetamine.” Urinalysis confirmed he was under the influence of methamphetamine.” Pacheco, age 30, reported using methamphetamine daily since the age of 16. The psychologist also diagnosed Pacheco as suffering from schizophrenia and opined that, if certain conditions are met, Pacheco “will not pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety if treated in the community.” The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed Pacheco on formal probation, with a condition that he serve 330 days in Ventura County Jail with credit for 325 days served. He was released to a mental health facility.
The court of appeal affirmed the denial of pretrial mental health diversion for Pacheco, stating: “The safety of the community is the highest law.” The denial was properly based on the court’s finding that Pacheco posed an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety. The court vacated sentencing fees imposed contrary to Assembly Bill 1869.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.