California v. Braden
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury convicted him on a charge of resisting an executive officer with force or violence, defendant-appellant Cory Braden, Jr. requested mental health diversion pursuant to Penal Code section 1001.36. In the published portion of its opinion, the Court of Appeal held he was ineligible for that section’s “pretrial diversion” because he did not request diversion before trial began. The Court disagreed with California v. Curry, 62 Cal.App.5th 314 (2021), which held that such a request could be made until entry of judgment. Therefore, the Court concluded the trial court properly denied his request to be considered for diversion, and affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.