People v. Matthews
Annotate this CaseA trial court's mistake pertaining to a superfluous element of the law does not constitute instructional error. In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the trial court did not commit instructional error and the prosecution did not commit misconduct. However, the court held that there were several sentencing errors that must be corrected. The court modified the judgment to reflect an award of presentence conduct credit in addition to actual credits. The court remanded for resentencing for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine defendant's ability to pay the restitution fine of $10,000 it previously imposed; to strike the parole revocation fine; and to strike the Three Strike findings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.