Anderson-Barker v. Superior Court
Annotate this Case
The Court of Appeal denied a petition for writ of mandate seeking an order directing the trial court to vacate its order and enter a new order directing the City to produce electronically-stored data relating to vehicles that private towing companies had impounded at the direction of the police department. The City argued that it did not possess or control the requested data, and thus the California Public Records Act was inapplicable in this case.
The court held that the City's right to access the Vehicle Information Impound Center and Laserfiche data was insufficient to establish constructive possession. Furthermore, nothing in City of San Jose v. Superior Court, (2017) 2 Cal.5th 609, 623, supported the view that an agency's contractual right to access a private entity's records qualified as a form of "possession" of those records within the meaning of section 6252, subdivision (e) of the CPRA.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.