California v. Wolfe
Annotate this CaseDefendant Kelly Wolfe killed a pedestrian while driving under the influence of alcohol. The prosecution charged Wolfe with an implied malice murder (colloquially known as a Watson murder). The trial court refused to instruct the jury on involuntary or vehicular manslaughter; it was well-settled that these were not lesser included offenses. The court also instructed the jury that voluntary intoxication was not a defense to an implied malice murder; this was also an accurate statement of California law. The jury convicted Wolfe of murder and other offenses. Wolfe claimed on appeal: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the murder conviction; (2) the trial court erred by not allowing a manslaughter instruction as a lesser included offense, thus violating the equal protection clause; and (3) the trial court failed to allow voluntary intoxication as a defense violates due process. Finding no reversible error, the Court of Appeal affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.