California v. Reardon
Annotate this CaseDefendant Sean Reardon was convicted for resisting an executive officer. He appealed, arguing the officer’s use of excessive force negated an essential element of that offense. In a related claim, defendant argued the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request to present the testimony of a use-of-force expert at trial. The Court of Appeal found ample evidence to support the resisting count. Further, although the trial court excluded defendant’s expert testimony for unsound reasons, defendant did not demonstrate prejudice. The case was remanded with directions to address sentencing errors and correct the abstract of judgment but otherwise affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.