California v. Henderson
Annotate this CaseDefendant Marlowe William Henderson, Jr., pleaded no contest to charges of stalking, vandalism, and disobeying a court order. At the restitution hearing, defendant argued he could not be ordered to pay restitution for the victims’ security system expenses because he was not convicted of a violent felony as required by section 1202.4(f)(3)(J). Defendant alternatively argued the security system was “redundant” and “excessive.” The trial court opined that the order sought was “well within its discretion” but failed to articulate any analysis of the relevant statutory scheme. The court ordered defendant to pay $7,997.02 in restitution including $5,796.79 for installation of the system. Finding no reversible error, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s restitution order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.