California v. Bradley
Annotate this CaseWhen arrested by law enforcement, defendant and admitted felon Sherone Bradley possessed a firearm he admitted possessing before and during the charged offense. Defendant was ultimately convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and argued on appeal that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion and denied him his constitutional rights when it denied his motion for disclosure of a confidential informant whom defendant claimed entrapped him; and (2) when it sustained a government agent's invocation of the privilege not to testify regarding the informant. The Court of Appeal concluded after review the trial court did not err. Any error, if there was one, was harmless under any standard of prejudicial error.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.