In re B.H.
Annotate this CaseTwo-year-old B.H. was removed from the custody of his parents, B.H. (Father) and K.E. (Mother) and declared the child a dependent of the court. The court thereafter denied Father reunification services under the bypass provision of section Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10). Father subsequently appealed, claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the jurisdictional findings against him and that there was insufficient evidence to support the denial of reunification services under section 361.5, subdivision (b)(10). After review of the particular facts of this case, the Court of Appeal rejected these contentions and affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.