California v. Mejia
Annotate this CaseDefendant-appellant Philip Mejia appealed his conviction for torture, spousal rape, spousal abuse, and criminal threats. The Court of Appeal rejected his contention that the court should have conducted a hearing pursuant to "California v. Marsden," (2 Cal.3d 118 (1970)) based on defendant's statements during a hearing on his request to represent himself and his contentions concerning the improper admission of evidence. The Court agreed, however, that the trial court erred in imposing an unstayed sentence on count 3. Accordingly, the case was remanded with directions to stay imposition of that sentence. The judgment was affirmed in all other respects.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.