California v. Relkin
Annotate this CaseDefendant Scott Relkin appealed his sentence following entry of pleas in case numbers CM040863 and CM041966. He contended the sentence exceeded the maximum to which he specifically agreed. He further contended the trial court erred by imposing certain conditions of mandatory supervision that were vague, overbroad, unconstitutional, and unrelated to rehabilitation. After review, the Court of Appeal remanded the matter to the trial court to modify probation condition No. 13. The Court also modified the judgment to correct an unauthorized sentence on count 2 in case No. CM041966, and affirmed the judgment as modified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.