Harris v. TAP Worldwide
Annotate this CasePlaintiff filed suit against defendants under federal laws, alleging that he was wrongfully terminated. On appeal, defendants challenge the trial court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The court concluded that the undisputed facts demonstrate that there is a valid arbitration agreement; the agreement to arbitrate is not illusory; and, as discussed in the unpublished part of the court's opinion, the arbitration agreement is not unconscionable to the degree that it is unenforceable. Accordingly, the court reversed the order compelling arbitration.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.